It’s the ‘probably’ that’s a problem. Now, I’m not making any arguments here, but probably shouldn’t offer the level of comfort many Atheists find in their belief that there’s probably no God. I’m just thinking of all the other probablys:
- The ice is probably safe to walk on.
- The gun is probably not loaded.
- The snarling dog probably won’t bite.
- Smoking cigarettes probably won’t give me cancer.
Is probably enough? Is requiring incontrovertible, incontestable, incorrigible, evidence to believe completely reasonable, but only probably to reject God?