Isn’t it cute how famed biologist Richard Dawkins tries so hard to offer theological commentary on the nature of God. He’s the world’s top thinker you know. What is he really trying to say here? Is he saying that God isn’t or shouldn’t be concerned with how the creatures who bear His image behave sexually? That’s an awfully presumptuous leap. I wonder if Dawkins considered that are significant theological reasons behind God’s regulation of human sexual interaction. My money’s on nope.
World’s top thinker Richard Dawkins still not that good at theology
September 10, 2013 by 2 Comments
Sifting Reality 
“theological” . . . . . Seriously, do you really need to be learned in Irish folklore before rejecting the existence of leprechauns?
What does this have to do with anything. This man claimed to KNOW about God. This “knowledge” is based on his cursory impressions not because of some learned findings. He essentially created an idea of God that was determined by isolating passages that confirms his bias. That’s about intellectually void as it gets. Tangentially, you should know what something is before you reject it.